U.S. Picks Men's Olympic Team
The U.S. announced the men's Olympic team Sunday in Philadelphia.
In addition to Paul Hamm and Jonathan Horton, the team will consist of Kevin Tan, Morgan Hamm, Justin Spring and Joseph Hagerty.
Team alternates are Sasha Artemev, Raj Bhavsar and David Durante.
Paul Hamm, the reigning Olympic champion, and Horton were named to the team Saturday following the conclusion of the men's competition at the Olympic Trials in Philadelphia. Hamm, who suffered a broken hand at the U.S. Championships in May in Houston, must confirm his readiness at a camp in late July.
Horton, who won the trials process (40 percent nationals plus 60 percent Trials), earned an berth by meeting the selection criteria that guaranteed an Olympic spot to the top two finishers providing they were in the top three on three events.
The men's selection committee decided the remainder of the team, which leaves the past four U.S. national all-around champions out of the lineup.
2008 national champion David Sender, who suffered a slight ankle sprain Tuesday in podium training, had petitioned directly to the Olympic team but was overlooked by the selection committee.
2005 national champion Todd Thornton did not advance to the Olympic Trials. Artemev won in 2006 and Durante won in 2007.
"I guess I didn't show them what I have, and we'll see what happens in my gymnastics career," said Artemev, whose bronze medal on pommel horse in 2006 was the only world medal for the U.S. men in the last quadrennium. "I didn't practice my whole lifetime to be alternate, so I'm not pleased."
Bhavsar will serve as an alternate for the second time, after being controversially overlooked for the 2004 team.
"I wasn't truly surprised when I was named the alternate, but there's a lot of disappointment with the three alternates, even the guys who didn't make the nine-member squad," Bhavsar said.
The women's competition concludes Sunday in Philadelphia, beginning at 6 p.m. local time. IG will provide live commentary.
What do you think of this team? Did the selection committee make the right decision? Post a comment below or on our forum!






Comments (63 posted):
I think race and discrimination factored in to the selection. How unfortunate for athletes who persevered and invested themselves to make it to the Olympics.
Durante, Raj and Artemev (Latino, Indian and Russian cultural backgrounds) should have been on the squad.
Morgan was selected because NBC wants to capitalize on the "family" angle for ratings. Ridiculous!
What comes around goes around USA Gymnastics!
SORRY RAJ
THAMK GOD I AM A CANADIAN.
SHAME ON YOU U. S. A
I feel bad for Sasha because if he were simply to hit his pommel horse on night 2 i believe he would have made the team, but he is just not worth the gamble.
Durante is in the same boat as Raj, but he helps the team even less. Raj and David are great alternates because they can fill in on almost any event.
The athlete I fill most sorry for is David Sender. Has he competed at Trials, he would have been right in the mix for the team, but because he got hurt he had no chance.
So no, not "Shame on USA." The selection committee knew what they were doing. They picked the team that has the potential for the best total score in Team prelims and Finals. And people need to simply accept the team and suport them. Don't say they are going to "Crash and Burn." Support USA, because regardless of whether or not you like the team, they need your support. So GO USA!!!
I will certainly support the team, but can still be disappointed in who was left off.
I stopped watching gymanstics for the last 10 years, so it's a bit confusing as to how they are choosing the team. Plus, if you don't know the athletes and their specialities, it makes it even more difficult to understand what's going on.
For instance, why Morgan Hamm again. But, I guess he's a floor specialist.
SHAME on USAG for being such cowards. They deserve to get beaten by the Chinese.
Can David Sender and Raj Bhavsar petition to be Paul's other brothers?
This is one of the reasons I stopped watching gymnastics. The scoring is so subjective. I love this sport and yet can totally understand why people say it's not a sport like track n' field, where you can actually win based on merits not race, who's more liked, past performances, etc.
Joseph Hagerty was by far the most consistent gymnast of the year. He hit 23 out of 24 routines. His high bar is best in the country only inferior to Paul Hamm, who by the way has the right to be cocky when you are the reigning Olympic Champion and former World Champion. Hagerty is also top 3 on floor too. You can use him on pommel horse or vault if you need too as well.
Justin Spring: His vault contributes a couple of tenths, which is huge for vault. His p-bars contributes up to half a point or more. You can use him on high bar. And he just started floor on tuesday and still managed to score two 15.1's with only a C dismount.
Kevin Tan is very valuable. His rings contributes a point everytime. He can also compete pommel horse and put up one of the higher scores for Team USA. he does high bar and p-bars well enough that he can compete them in team prelims and not cost us any or much.
And no one has any discrepencies about horton making the team.
You also have to look at the make up of the team. With Paul and Horton automatically on it, you have to build from there. Tan was a lock as well. With Tan on the team, you need guys who do floor and vault because without that, we dont have enough guys to compete every event. Morgan fit that bill best because he does pommel horse well also. With Morgan on the team, you can't have someone like Sean Golden who doesnt even do p-bars and pommels because then you start running out of enough guys to compete on every event in prelims. So then you put Hagerty on the team because he can do every event well except rings where we are already reasonably strong. And Spring then finishes it off with every event but pommel horse.
Guys like Raj, simply aren't strong enough for Team USA where Team USA needs strength. Raj does well on rings, but not as well as Tan Horton or Paul. his high bar is bad which is a place we need some depth. His vault is good, but so is every other gymnast's vault. His p-bars are good also, but we gain no more than .2 by putting him there. His floor is not good so we cn't use him there. And the msot important event, pommel horse, is not very good for him with a 14 being his strongest. Raj is a great gymnast, just simply not right for the team. Much of that can be said for David Durante as well. They simply don't help out the tea enough to make them good choices.
If you don't believe my reasoning, go do the math. Figre out a better team that works for the 6-5-4 format and the # up 3 count format. IF you do let me know, but I already did it all and this is the best team. The only change I would consider would be putting Sasha on for his pommel horse, but that is such a big risk and he simply didn't earn it throughout the selection process.
And if Paul Hamm falls, we have no chance of a medal. So you would rather have one gymnast fall and the team win nothing AND get no individual medal than someone who isn't even that arrogant win a medal and probably be the reason USA gets a medal?
On the David Sender front. He maybe should have been given an alternate spot but not a spot on the team. He does not have the resume that Paul Hamm does so I don't think anyone should expect that he would just be granted a position on the team.
Sasha Artemev it's quite simple. He's lucky to be an alternate. He screwed up big and is way to inconsistent. While he could possibly help us on pommel horse he could hurt us a lot in other places.
Justin Spring and Joseph Hagerty: I think Hagerty proved himself enough that he definitely deserved a spot on the team. I like Justin as well but their very similar. I actually think that Raj should be on the team and Justin should be the alternate.
David Durante: Again he stepped up the second day and should be commended, but he was awful day one and it definitely cost him a spot on the team.
Canadians are no better though, they hate brown people more than Americans.. pathetic. The only skin color an athlete should have is the color of sweat..
USA Gymnastics is just as racist as Gymnastics Canada. Brown people stay out (but that's in the smallest fine print).
olympicgymnastics, I agree. Spring and Hagerty are very similar, and you might be able to use Raj in place of Spring. Hagerty was too consistent not to put him on the team. He was way more consistent than Raj and helps on event that the USA needs help on. And Spring just puts up bigger numbers on the events that Raj is good on. Spring is better on floor, vault, p-bars, and high bar, than Raj. Raj is only better on rings where we already have three guys. And also, what many people don't realize, if Spring could simply do a mediocre pommel horse routine and score a 14.0 or so he would have won the first day of trials in the all-around. A 14.5 in the second day would have easily put him in the top 2 or 3 spots. Just because you don't see his name up there in the all-around, people overlook him. In reality, he is one of the strongest gymnasts as long as he is healthy. The only differnce between Spring and, say, Horton, is that horton does his weakest event (which he wont compete in Beijing at finals) and Spring doesn't do his weakest event.
http://www2.usa-gymnastics.org/scores/OT08SRMenResultsDay2.htm
I looked at everyone's score and concluded that Justin Spring should be OUT and Raj Bhavsar should be IN. If you look at the scores, the only events Spring could help the team is vault and p-bars; however Bhavsar can help the team with rings, vault and p-bars.
Who is in charge of picking these men?
and infinity, how do you explain chainey umphrey being on the 96 team if brown people aren't allowed?
And there is no point in explaining why Morgan deserves to be on this team, gymcam413 hit the nail on the head.
Instead of acting like two years and screaming foul play you should follow the athletes example, ALL THREE of the alternates have said that while they are disappointed they still support the team and will be cheering on Team USA in August.
i understand where you are coming from, and you are probably right. about the arrogance thing: yes, i'd rather see someone lose if they are arrogant; thats just how i am. no one has the 'right' to be arrogant, no matter how accomplished they are. confident, yes. but arrogant, no.
3 scores count on each of 6 events in the finals. With 6 gymnasts, that's an average of 3 events each. So, if you wanted to make the Olympic team, why on earth would you even bother doing all 6 events? It compromises the events you are best at when you need to divide your time. It's not good for the team.
But the goal should not be just the team score. There are 7 other medals available. They should pic athletes that will bring home medals, regardless of whether it is in the team category or not.
Stop being so reactionary people. It would have been reverse racism to put him on because of his skin.
The fact is, that he is a good all-arounder, but the team doesn't need all-arounders.
5 that are great at high bar, but only one (paul) that can break 15 on pommels. we have virtually no one to put up in our horse lineup. this is NOT a medal contending team.
Also, I agree 100% with everything gymcam413 has said. It appears he is the only one who has done any sort of research and the only one who knows the facts. So scroll up and read what gymcam413 has written because he knows his stuff. Go USA
USAG should be ashamed putting Morgan on the team because of Paul's selfishness. Paul does not care about the team at all.
1. Paul won't compete unless his parasitic twin Morgan goes
2. Paul won't compete if he can't do all-around. He is there for the all-around ONLY.
I don't know who the bigger embarrassment is, Paul or USAG for tolerating this prima dona.
I am also done explaining Raj. there is nothing more to say.
Caroline2146: I agree Sasha would be a great choice for the team, but what kind of example would USAG be setting by putting him on. Throughtout the selection process he finished as low as 7th (maybe lower I would have to check) at the Championships prelims, and as high as 1st at the Trials Prelims. He is way too inconsistent and did nothing to EARN his way on to the team. Places shouldn't be given out simply because a gymnast is talented. If he can't show that he can step up to the plate, then he shouldn't be on the team. But again, I would have liked to see him on the team, I just had a hard time justifying putting him on when he failed to hit the one event he helped on 3 out of 4 times. Plus by putting him on, we take another member off and we would lose some points with that guy that Sasha will not make up for if he falls and will not more than make up for if he hits.
The deal with David Sender: I am not 100% sure about this, but I believe it to be the case. With Sender's injury preventing him from competing, he had to petition. His petition was for the Olympic TEAM which does not include alternates. IF Sender had competed and done well he might have made it, but again he is one of those guys that doesn't really help out where the team needs him most, so he would have been on the bubble anyway. But because he didn't compete he had to petition onto the TEAM and they had no justification for putting him on the team. And I am pretty sure they couldn't put im as an alternate. (Although they are the ones in charge and they seem to be able to do whatever they want.) But putting him as an alternate is not the best idea. Alternates are there in case a team member gets hurt. If your alternate is hurt, then he is rather worthless. I do believe that Sender had a great shot and would have made a good addition to the team/alternate, but he was a victim of bad circumstances and was too large a gamble. Sprained ankles can take anywhere from 2-12 weeks to heal making him too large of a risk. (And Lschoepps, just because he was walking, does not mean his foot was anywhere near healed. I have competed with a broken foot and could still tumble but my foot was definitely not better and it definitely caused my performance to suffer.) And just for the record, I am a big fan of David Sender and feel the utmost sympathy fr him in regard to the entire most unfortunate situation.
Also, USAG does not discriminate against national champs. They were simply not the right choices for the team which I explained in more detail above. Paul is a national champ, and Johnathon Horton would have been had he caught his Kolman on just ONE of the two days of Visa.
And how can you say that Paul won't compete without his brother...he has competeted since January without Morgan. And he has NEVER SAID THAT HE WOULDN'T COMPETE IF HE CAN'T DO ALL-AROUND. He said if he didn't feel that he was able to contribute to the team because he was still injured that he would pull himself out. Paul has never asked for the attention he recieves, or the supposed special treatment from USAG, so you have no right to call him a prima dona. I think the real embarrassment is people like you who start these horrible rumors and who can't act like an adult just because their favorite gymnast wasn't chosen.
P.S. While Sender is a good gymnast, his strengths are on events that the US doesn't need him on (like floor). Many anaylists weren't even putting him on the team when he was healthy.
Raj is Indian. USA and Canada have replaced their hatred of black with brown.
Another great gymnast of "brown" descent who was on the national team for Canada could easily verify that what I say is true. Maybe no one here is racist or is unaware of this but it's real.
As comedian Russell Peters said, brown is now the new black. Be thankful black people, you're now off the hook. American, Canadians, enjoy your new wave of hatred!
Look I feel bad that Raj didn't make it because I am a fan of his but seriously... the selection committee is racist; oh come on.
Regarding Paul; what proof do any of you have that he won't compete without his brother?!?!?! Morgan has the resume and the experience to be on that team. Morgan, with his experience, is so huge for that team. Other then his brother, no one else has made an Olympic team, and having people who understand what it takes is something you can't put a price on.
It's sad what happened to Sender because he was the national champion but the difference is that there wasn't enough time to prove readiness. Had the men done a third step like the women; there's a chance this team might look a little bit different.
You guys really need to chill with the race card: Chainey Umphrey, Jair Lynch, Dominique Dawes, Amy Chow, Mohini Bhardwaj, Annia Hatch, Betty Okino... do I really need to say anymore.
gymcam, what the hell does usag care about the example they'll be setting or what anyone else thinks; they care about the team total.
right now we have paul, morgan, jon, joey, tan, spring that bring in good scores on high bar, but only one person (paul) that can bring in a good score on pommels. it would have made 50 times more sense to take out one of those high bars and put in the only good pommels person.
one more thing, i know joey is incredibly consistent but how can we put up someone who's never gone to worlds before or been in that 3 up 3 count pressure situation??
It's a bit shocking, the ugly things the Hamms have to hear about themselves here. I am just glad that they have already gone through fire in 2004 and hopefully have grown thick skins to deal with the pettiness and meanness of some members of the public.
I have never seen any evidence that Paul is anything but admirably confident. They both strike me as kind and considerate people. Morgan is not on the team because he is some kind of good luck charm for Paul. He is on the team because he is strong, experienced, and can do what is needed and turn in guaranteed solid routines. I am glad they both made it.
I think we have a very strong, competitive team for Beijing. GO GUYS!
THIS TEAM CAN WIN A MEDAL AND THE PEOPLE ON IT ARE SPECIAL AND CONSISTENT ENOUGH TO WIN INDIVIDUALY AS WELL.
with the 6/3/3 rule its all about specialists not mediocre all-arounders. a team can win with 2 great all arounders and some guys that are great at certain events. If Raj or any of the other guys that are not on the team were actually on it; they wouldn’t make it to the all around final because they’re not good enough and if USAG has gymnasts that can score better in the events that they are good at, why put them on the team?
Look at the women, they could probably win with just Johnson, Luikin, Memmel and Sacramone. If they were to not put Hong on the team even if she placed higher all around than someone that did make the team, it would be completely understandable because she’s a mediocre all arounder right now and she probably wont make the team. And it wouldn’t be racist against Asians.
It really does suck that Raj, Shasha, and David D. are not on the team, it really does and I feel bad for Raj but I’m not gonna say that he was left out because of racism, in that case the same goes for Durante who is obviously ‘brown’. They are alternates and if any of the guys currently on the team get injured they’ll make good replacements.
Maybe the men should have done the same thing as the women and waited till July 20th to announce the team and see if Paul, Morgan and Justin are healthy and 100% before announcing the team but if they are healthy this team can be great.
Anyways, whatever its not like anyone is going to read this.
btwz consistently getting 13s on pommels, does NOT make you good at horse
I feel bad for Sasha, but we can't send him to Beijing on a 25% chance that he'll stay on the apparatus. Even though he is still the best on pommel, that wouldn't be the only event that he competes in. Would it be smart to have a great pommel score and have to contend with, say, a low H-bar score? Think about the entire picture.
Raj. What can I say? I thought he was a lock. There is no doubt that his routines need higher difficulty. Especially on his pommel, Raj's A score needs to be higher. However, I thought we could work with him at camp. I thought he was on the team. I really don't know what to say about calling him an alternate. I feel bad for him. In this aspect, I hope the committee knows what they're doing.
I thought David Durante was good, but I wasn't sure about making the team. He was solid at the trials, though. I'm glad that we at least have him for an alternate.
We needed Jonathan Horton on this team. There was no going to Beijing without him. He's consistent and he can do the hard moves. My big surprise this year was Joey Hagerty, Mr. Consistency himself! He hit every routine and his A values are something to be proud of. I was so happy when they named him, because I was afraid that they might (although I couldn't think of a good reason to leave him off).
Kevin didn't impress me at Trials, except for his Rings routine. I hope his p-bars and pommel live up to what he is capable of.
Justin. Oh God, Justin. He can hardly cross the street without getting injured! And not small injuries -- he'll be falling into a manhole next. However, he is powerful and entirely unafraid. He can do the hard moves because he doesn't doubt himself. He's solid. I think he's going to be great on the team.
You can't go to Beijing without Paul Hamm! Quite literally, right before the broken hand, he was the best gymnast in the world. To even attempt an Olympics without Paul Hamm would be foolhardy beyond repair. It's insanity.
That's why David Sender couldn't make the team. There were two injury petitions. Worse-case scenario, neither man is ready for the Olympics. We cannot risk that. We can't risk both Paul and David being named to the team and not being ready! It's a shame because I was looking forward to seeing Dave perform, but he never had a chance. He wasn't going to be chosen over Paul Hamm and he wasn't given the chance to compete.
Those are my thoughts on the team. Altogether, they have very strong. The men have such great attitudes toward the sport and are already very bonded. This was one of the best teams we could have put together! GOOD LUCK IN BEIJING, BOYS! BRING US HOME A MEDAL!
First of all, Paul Hamm is anything but cocky. Last I checked, it is not cockiness to say that you believe you worked hard and earned something (his gold medal). I must have missed the press conference where he came out and said that he refuses to perform in Beijing (for ANY reason: Morgan, All-Around, not enough Chinese food... anything at all).
Secondly, you cannot compare David Sender and Paul Hamm! David hasn't even been a star athlete this year. No one expected him to win Nationals. I'm not saying the man isn't talented, but his resume was not nearly enough to get the *second* injury spot on the Olympic team. For all we know, he might have bombed Trials. We didn't have enough to go by. Paul Hamm, on the other hand, has YET to lose a competition since his *comeback*. The wiser choice, if you remain unbiased, is Paul Hamm. In all likelihood, Paul would have beaten David at Nationals as it is. Nevertheless, David's luck was rotten and he didn't have a chance. I hope he sticks around for 2012 because I look forward to watching him have his day.
I'm still surprised Raj didn't make it on the team, but I do agree with previous comments that he is not the strongest in any events. Do I think that he might have been able to improve for Beijing? Yes. However, cruel as it sounds, we already have athletes who triumph on certain apparatuses. You can either take the people who are already ready or take Raj, whom you would hope to improve. I feel bad for him. I'd like to see him get his day because Raj is a great athelete, but I can see where the committee is coming from.
There's no need to dispute Joey or John. John was pretty much a lock and after Joey's performances, you just can't argue his spot.
Remember, first and foremost we are looking for team medals. Those who help the US *team* are being sent to Beijing. People like Sasha can earn an individal medal, but how would they fare in the team competition? That's the most important question.
Honestly, every man named on that team is talented. They are the best of the best (maybe not in the All-Around, but in their events). The alternates are great because they can fill in almost anywhere.
Like it or not, this is your team. Support them or keep your comments to yourself because you cannot change it. Every athelete that was good enough to make it to Trials deserved a chance at the team. Our team is comprised of the best of the best. Support them and show them that you appreciate the sacrifices they make to represent you, the American citizen, in a grand-scale international affair.
Once again, good luck to the men's team in Beijing! I have no doubt that they will be returning with a medal. GO USA!
So thank you for some positive comments. And GO Team USA!!
But that's all in the past and it doesn't matter any more. I think we have a very strong US team and encourage our boys to go out there and kick some international butt!
Post your comment