A Sad End to the Hamm Saga
Paul Hamm's withdrawal — "resigning," as USA Gymnastics worded it in its official release — from the 2008 Olympic team stunned the sports world, but it really wasn't all that surprising. If you had heard Hamm speak to the media after being named to the Olympic team at the U.S. Olympic Trials in June, you could sense the unease with which he had accepted that vote of confidence from the men's selection committee.
In hindsight, the U.S. Men's Program would have been better off following the lead of the women's program, which didn't finalize its team until mid-July. Then it wouldn't have been saddled with a team built largely around Hamm's all-around capabilities.
What is surprising is how easily Hamm passed his readiness test at a July training camp, even though he was far from ready. Was this wishful thinking on the part of the U.S. Men's Program, or a rationalization of naming Hamm, who had a broken hand, to the team in the first place? I think it would have made more sense to name him as an alternate at the trials. And U.S. champion David Sender, who had to withdraw from trials because of a sprained ankle, should have been added too.
"My hand, in general, has not gotten to the point where I felt comfortable doing all of my skills," said Hamm on Monday, adding that he had pushed himself to "perform skills during the camp that I had not done since my recent surgery."
Hamm also didn't show all of his difficulty at the camp, and I was also told that he was hardly ready on rings, an event on which he was desperately needed in Beijing.
Complaining of a sore left shoulder after the camp, Hamm said he felt worse upon returning home to Columbus, Ohio. "Unfortunately, the week after camp has been a disaster," he said. "I have not been able to do a single full routine since I competed [at U.S. Championships] in May."
Hamm's absence opens the door for Raj Bhavsar, who was named to the team hours after Hamm's announcement. "This is a tremendous honor, and the first feeling that comes to mind is that dreams can come true," said Bhavsar, who had felt slighted by his alternate status in 2004. "Unfortunately, this comes at the expense of a great athlete, Paul Hamm. My heart goes out to him."
Though U.S. aspirations might have deflated considerably, an Olympic team medal is not out of the question. At the 2007 World Championships, a Hamm-less U.S. finished fourth behind Germany — in Stuttgart. There is no reason why the team can't challenge for a medal in Beijing.
Hamm, a two-time Olympian, all-around world champion (2003) and Olympic champion, says he's through with competitive gymnastics. He plans to do the post-Olympic tour and eventually pursue an MBA.
"It was a big goal of mine to see if I could contend in the all-around again and defend my gold from the Athens Olympics," Hamm said. "This has been the hardest decision that I've ever had to make."
Knowing the high standard Hamm probably had set for himself, his decision to pull out didn't surprise me.
- U.S. Picks Men's Olympic Team
- Comaneci: No Question in Chinese Victory
- Ziert Alert: Alicia, It's Not Your Fault
- Chinese Women Claim First Olympic Team Title
- Pretty in Pink, Liukin Wins All-Around





Comments (15 posted):
^^^^^^^ That says it all. It was never about helping the team.
Paul was a HUGE asset to Team USA and we need him. However, we still have a strong team and I'm glad that they picked Raj to fill his place. All of our alternates would have done a great job. We can still medal in Beijing. It's just that this is a huge blow. I can't see anyone challenging Yang Wei in the All-Around now.
I feel terribly for PAul Hamm. This must have been extremely difficult for him. I am not sure though that a 100% Raj is better than a not 100% Paul. But I guess if he couldn't make routines all the way through than he wouldn't be of use. I am really happy for Raj though. He really earned this! He deserves to go to the Olympic Games!
In the letter, Grandi stated that Yang Tae Young was the "true winner" of the competition
Fair Play
maybe he is from Russia... or Mexico... France? Ohio??? (gymcam scratches his head...)
The selection commitee eiheer lied for Paul and said he was ready when he wasn't or Paul's first injury was way exagerated and the shoulder injury is what took him out. The second part of my comments is what I keep hearing.
Now they love to claim he's selfish for stepping down when he couldn't compete as competently as his teammates and alternates. I suppose staying would be less selfish? Ya know, it's kinda hard to obtain and keep endorsements and earn money from them when you don't show up for the Olympics. Giving up the opportunities to capitalize financially from his third Olympics when he didn't have to is soooo selfish. I mean, it's all about the AA without any consideration for the financial impact whatsoever, right?
:::::eyeroll:::::::
On a different matter, this is a pretty lame column. The real question that Dwight should be asking and answering is why did the selection committee pick Raj over the other alternates -- in other words, go for ring strength over pommel strength in an replacement. It's a question that gets glossed over but merits some analysis and some answers from committee members.
gymbeau i completely agree with you about the athens all-around and paul stepping down from these olympics.
i probably would have put in sasha srtemev instead of raj bhavsar but it's great that he gets to compete finally.
Post your comment