A Sad End to the Hamm Saga

print Print version Comment Comment
email E-mail This Article to a Friend

Paul Hamm's withdrawal — "resigning," as USA Gymnastics worded it in its official release — from the 2008 Olympic team stunned the sports world, but it really wasn't all that surprising. If you had heard Hamm speak to the media after being named to the Olympic team at the U.S. Olympic Trials in June, you could sense the unease with which he had accepted that vote of confidence from the men's selection committee.

In hindsight, the U.S. Men's Program would have been better off following the lead of the women's program, which didn't finalize its team until mid-July. Then it wouldn't have been saddled with a team built largely around Hamm's all-around capabilities.

What is surprising is how easily Hamm passed his readiness test at a July training camp, even though he was far from ready. Was this wishful thinking on the part of the U.S. Men's Program, or a rationalization of naming Hamm, who had a broken hand, to the team in the first place? I think it would have made more sense to name him as an alternate at the trials. And U.S. champion David Sender, who had to withdraw from trials because of a sprained ankle, should have been added too.

"My hand, in general, has not gotten to the point where I felt comfortable doing all of my skills," said Hamm on Monday, adding that he had pushed himself to "perform skills during the camp that I had not done since my recent surgery."

Hamm also didn't show all of his difficulty at the camp, and I was also told that he was hardly ready on rings, an event on which he was desperately needed in Beijing.

Complaining of a sore left shoulder after the camp, Hamm said he felt worse upon returning home to Columbus, Ohio. "Unfortunately, the week after camp has been a disaster," he said. "I have not been able to do a single full routine since I competed [at U.S. Championships] in May."

Hamm's absence opens the door for Raj Bhavsar, who was named to the team hours after Hamm's announcement. "This is a tremendous honor, and the first feeling that comes to mind is that dreams can come true," said Bhavsar, who had felt slighted by his alternate status in 2004. "Unfortunately, this comes at the expense of a great athlete, Paul Hamm. My heart goes out to him."

Though U.S. aspirations might have deflated considerably, an Olympic team medal is not out of the question. At the 2007 World Championships, a Hamm-less U.S. finished fourth behind Germany — in Stuttgart. There is no reason why the team can't challenge for a medal in Beijing.

Hamm, a two-time Olympian, all-around world champion (2003) and Olympic champion, says he's through with competitive gymnastics. He plans to do the post-Olympic tour and eventually pursue an MBA.

"It was a big goal of mine to see if I could contend in the all-around again and defend my gold from the Athens Olympics," Hamm said. "This has been the hardest decision that I've ever had to make."

Knowing the high standard Hamm probably had set for himself, his decision to pull out didn't surprise me.

Rate this article
3.43

Comments (15 posted):

Lschoepps on Monday, July 28, 2008
"It was a big goal of mine to see if I could contend in the all-around again and defend my gold from the Athens Olympics," Hamm said. "This has been the hardest decision that I've ever had to make."

^^^^^^^ That says it all. It was never about helping the team.
USGoingforGold on Monday, July 28, 2008
Oh cut it out. Lshoepps, you cannot make it more clear that you don't belong here on this article. If it was all about him, he would have gone anyway. He was already named to the team and survived Readiness.

Paul was a HUGE asset to Team USA and we need him. However, we still have a strong team and I'm glad that they picked Raj to fill his place. All of our alternates would have done a great job. We can still medal in Beijing. It's just that this is a huge blow. I can't see anyone challenging Yang Wei in the All-Around now.
emthegymnast on Monday, July 28, 2008
well, duh! i knew when he came into this that he wasnt going in it for the team. it was quite abvious. you could tel he wanted it, badly.
USGoingforGold on Monday, July 28, 2008
I only want to say this one more time: If Paul was doing it for himself, he'd be going to Beijing and competing. He is showing that he is the bigger man and a true athlete by doing what is best for the team. I don't know how anyone could look at this disastrous event and think differently. Yes, like any other athlete, Paul had personal aspirations, but he obviously put his team above himself. Honestly, I'm not sure I would -- or many other athletes would -- in his shoes. But he did and that's what matters. You can tell what is most important to him.
gymcam413 on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Yang Wei is definitely the all-around favorite now. His start value is huge compared to everyone else! But there are a couple of other guys who could sneak up on him. Fabien Hambuchen from Germany and Tomita from... I'm not exactly sure. I hope Yang Wei can withstand the pressure though and win! He deserves it!

I feel terribly for PAul Hamm. This must have been extremely difficult for him. I am not sure though that a 100% Raj is better than a not 100% Paul. But I guess if he couldn't make routines all the way through than he wouldn't be of use. I am really happy for Raj though. He really earned this! He deserves to go to the Olympic Games!
goldengalaxy on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
If, (according to you [sic] declarations to the press), you would return your medal to the Korean if the FIG requested it, then such an action would be recognised as the ultimate demonstration of Fair-play by the whole world. The FIG and the IOC would highly appreciate the magnitude of this gesture.

In the letter, Grandi stated that Yang Tae Young was the "true winner" of the competition

Fair Play
Jason on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
It really doesn't matter whether Paul wanted to be on the team for personal reasons or to help the team because the fact remains the team would have benefitted greatly from a healthy Paul Hamm. Additionally, it is entirely appropriate for any gymnast-much less the reigning Olympic champion-to want to have a successful individual experience at the Olympics. What is important to recognize is that Paul stepped aside when he realized that he wasn't able to perform to Olympic standards and, in doing so, allowed a healthier gymnast to replace him and attempt to assist the team better than Paul could have. However, I agree with Dwight that US Gymnastics made an error in building the team around Paul, gambling that he would be able to compete, and not naming a better all-around gymnast as an alternate (Sender). It was a bad decision and I am ashamed at their incompetence. I am happy for Raj that he will finally get his Olympic experience, but the fact is Sender is a better all-around gymnast and would have been a better asset to the team.
Lschoepps on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Gymcam you don't know where Tomita is from???? Hiroyuki Tomita. The 2005 world all-around champion. Led his team to victory at the 2004 Olympic Games. You are so ignorant it is sad.

maybe he is from Russia... or Mexico... France? Ohio??? (gymcam scratches his head...)
Kim83anthro on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Great article! It'll be an interesting team, but the guys are dedicated--with or without Paul Hamm. Why the selection committee formed the entire team around an unhealthy athlete is a bit crazy. In hindsight there could have been better decisions made, but it is what it is. Go Team USA!
gymcam413 on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Lschoepps... No, at the moment I did not know where Tomita is from. So instead of guessing, I admitted I was unsure. I was pretty sure he was from Japan, but because I was positive, I did not write tht. IT seems worse to write an incorrect nationality, than to admit I was unsure. And ignorant I am not. Extremely informed about international gymnasts I am not, but that does not mean I am ignorant. I understand the sport of gymnastics far better than you ever did. For instance, can you watch a pommel horse routine or floor routine and determine the start value as quickly as the judges themselves? I doubt it. Just because I admitted to not knowing where Hiroyuki Tomita is from, that does not give you the right to call me ignorant. I know gymnastics. I may not be an expert on past world and Olympic Champions, but considering I can only remember watching the Olympics since Sidney, I think I have good reason not to have them memorized.
USGoingforGold on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Yang Wei can't be touched now. I have hopes for Jonathan to medal and I'm almost positive that Fabian will. It's going to be a close competition!
Bruin on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Lschoepps I agree with you 100% and I don't feel bad for Paul at all. He isn't missing out on his first Olympics. He already has a gold medal (he didn't deserve)and has competed at two Olympics.

The selection commitee eiheer lied for Paul and said he was ready when he wasn't or Paul's first injury was way exagerated and the shoulder injury is what took him out. The second part of my comments is what I keep hearing.
gymbeau on Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Man, people love to rejoice in any misfortune that befalls Paul Hamm. They love to claim he should have given back his medal when he was awarded it by the judges and FIG refused to take it away, as if Paul was there as a back-up judge and not an athlete. They love to call Paul a bad sport, when what's REALLY bad sportsmanship is contesting a score AFTER the competition is already over AND YOU'VE ALREADY LOST.

Now they love to claim he's selfish for stepping down when he couldn't compete as competently as his teammates and alternates. I suppose staying would be less selfish? Ya know, it's kinda hard to obtain and keep endorsements and earn money from them when you don't show up for the Olympics. Giving up the opportunities to capitalize financially from his third Olympics when he didn't have to is soooo selfish. I mean, it's all about the AA without any consideration for the financial impact whatsoever, right?

:::::eyeroll:::::::

On a different matter, this is a pretty lame column. The real question that Dwight should be asking and answering is why did the selection committee pick Raj over the other alternates -- in other words, go for ring strength over pommel strength in an replacement. It's a question that gets glossed over but merits some analysis and some answers from committee members.
alexandrite105 on Wednesday, July 30, 2008
bruin, i agree that at least paul isn't missing his first/only olympics, but you're so wrong about the athens all-around, but in what you claim (that he didn't deserve to win) and in bringing it up in the first place. it's over and done with.

gymbeau i completely agree with you about the athens all-around and paul stepping down from these olympics.

i probably would have put in sasha srtemev instead of raj bhavsar but it's great that he gets to compete finally.
carlyfan on Sunday, August 03, 2008
I love Raj and I am sooo happy he is going to Beijing! He really deserves it and he will really really help out the team!!!

Post your comment comment