Scouting the U.S. Women's Team

print Print version Comment Comment
email E-mail This Article to a Friend
If five of the six members of the U.S. women's Olympic team are locks — and I think they are — the sixth spot presents any intriguing situation. Given the top five are Shawn Johnson, Nastia Liukin, Chellsie Memmel, Samantha Peszek and Alicia Sacramone, the final berth is a battle among Ivana Hong, Jana Bieger, Shayla Worley and Bridget Sloan. And as impressive as Mattie Larson was in Philadelphia, I'm not sure Marta Karolyi will take a chance on someone with limited experience. But, hey, what do I know? I was surprised when she chose both Annia Hatch and Mohini Bhardwaj in 2004. But I was glad she did.

Anyway, the final spot will be determined largely by uneven bars scoring potential, and among the aforementioned candidates, Bieger is ahead, having ranked third on bars at trials, behind Liukin and Memmel. Hong was fifth, Sloan eighth, Larson ninth and Worley, who fell the second day, 10th.

Bieger, the 2006 world all-around silver medalist, is an interesting case, since she has been out of the picture because of injury. "You know how it is," Andrea Bieger, Jana's coach and mother, told me in Philadelphia after the first day of competition. "They forgot about [her], and you have to start from [the bottom]."

Said Jana, after day two: "I was just happy with myself just to show everybody that I'm back here and competing again." I have to believe Karolyi noticed.

Worley can probably relate to Bieger's situation. Second at the U.S. championships a year ago and a member of the 2007 world champion team, Worley has been slowed by a herniated disk in her back. She's great on bars, though, but must prove it at the selection camp.

Sloan also is accomplished on bars, but she looked a bit mechanical in Philadelphia. I'd like to see her perform and not simply execute. She's got a lot of upside, and needs to trust her ability.

It's too late to change now, but I think Liukin should experiment with a new uneven bars dismount after the Olympics. The rest of her routine is often flawless, but the form break on the tucked barani-out might not be worth it. I think she could learn a tucked full-out (like Svetlana Khorkina did) and score even higher. Now that's a scary thought for her bars competitors!

Though Johnson weakest event is bars, she is really clean and consistent. She is not built for inside-Stalders, so she relies on a high B-score and big dismount (double-twisting double layout). Her coach, Liang Chow, has done well to get the most out of Johnson on this event. If Johnson competes beyond 2008, I could see her adding a full twist to her Gienger.

Hong placed fifth all-around at both the U.S. championships and trials, and she has a double-twisting Yurchenko. She ditched her signature German giant sequence on bars because it wasn't rewarded at the 2007 worlds, and her new routine scores a bit higher. She may not be Karolyi's answer on bars, but she still has much to offer as a table-setter.

I understand Karolyi's philosophy of wanting to wait until the last minute to choose the team, but I wonder if it's worth it in terms of the added stress on the gymnasts. Johnson and Liukin were named to the team in Philadelphia, but Memmel, Peszek and Sacramone face another month of flipping and twisting by day and tossing and turning at night. Their chickens have already hatched, so why not give their worry glands a much needed rest?

Rate this article
3.21

Comments (11 posted):

alexandrite105 on Friday, July 04, 2008
i completely agree; i understand martha karolyi wanting to pick the best team at the time of the games, but that's what alternates are for in case a front runner gets injured or something. a part of me hopes jana bieger gets the final spot on the team; she deserves it, but another part of me hopes that shayla worley gets healed enough that she can do her best at the camp since i think she is the third highest bar potential after liukin and memmel. in any case i am extremely excited!
USGoingforGold on Friday, July 04, 2008
The last two times I have seen Shayla perform live, I have not been impressed. With her injuries, current and serious as they are, I'm not sure I want her on the team. However, if Marta picks her, then I have to trust Marta and Shayla will probably prove me wrong.

Personally, I would choose Jana Bieger. However, Bridget is still in the running because she is capable of a lot more than she showed at Trials. She had a bad meet. I would choose Jana, but I think Jana and Shayla are going to make it as alternates. Based on what I've seen and heard, I think Bridget is going to end up being the sixth.

And there's no doubt that Chellsie, Alicia, and Sam are locks. Hopefully, they sleep a little easier at night. As for the open sixth spot, those girls are living a stress-filled nightmare, because it really isn't clear at all who is going to be picked.
Bruin on Saturday, July 05, 2008
Shayla Worley does not deserve to be on this team. Why do Trials and Nationals matter for everyone but her? She messed up several times and still gets the benefit of the doubt but gymnasts like Bridget and Jana don't? Makes little sense to me.

This quote from above is not true. In fact Nastia has not been flawless with her new UB routine since she got it. Her form problems are just glossed over by this magaizne.

The rest of her routine is often flawless
postell08 on Saturday, July 05, 2008
I hope that the last spot goes to either Bridget or Shayla, depending on who scores higher on bars at camp. Jana did her job at Trials, but that doesn't make her gymnastics equal to everyone else's in terms of quality.
alexandrite105 on Saturday, July 05, 2008
i'm confused bruin, first you say that nastia's bar routine is not flawless and her form problems are glossed over by this magazine, then you say the rest of her routine is often flawless- well which is it? if you are talking about her dismount, the article is saying that she needs to change it (thereby agreeing with you). if you are talking about her actual routine, then you're contradicting yourself.
gold on Saturday, July 05, 2008
I don't care for Jana's gymnastics, but she's the most consistent out of that remaining bunch. Shayla has the highest scoring potential, though. It depends how much of a risk it is to take her.

As for Nastia's dismount, I also think it would be cool if she did a tucked full out in the future. But for the Olympics, I don't mind the double front half... when she's not exhausted at the end of the routine. When she's not tired, it looks great.
Quetzalcoatl on Sunday, July 06, 2008
Shayla's blend of artistry and technical value (while fit) are exquisite, but I don't think she's up to Beijing with her current problems.

On the flipside, I don't like Jana's style and form at all, but from her latest performances, she's really proved her consistency, and if I were choosing the team in terms of amassing the biggest score, I'd probably go for her.

As for Nastia's dismount, I have no idea why she just doesn't do a double front - she wouldn't lose that much in TV, and could spare the unnecessary deductions that she almost always sustains with the half-twisting option.

:-)
aldonza on Sunday, July 06, 2008
As for Nastia's dismount, I have no idea why she just doesn't do a double front - she wouldn't lose that much in TV, and could spare the unnecessary deductions that she almost always sustains with the half-twisting option.


I'm not sure what you mean by TV, but the double front and double front-half are worth the same(makes sense right??)
theblindteacher on Sunday, July 06, 2008
Good analysis. I am still hoping for Bridget for the last spot, though I think Jana is most likely. I hope something awful like a missed dismount doesn't come to haunt Nastia at one of the key times: TF, AA, or bars finals. Seems likely, unfortunately, that at least one of those three times could be a problem, based on her percentage of times she's struggled on it recently.
ickle on Monday, July 07, 2008
On Nastia's dismount: She added the half out of the double front after missing the plain double when she first introduced it at nationals. It eliminates the blind landing. My understanding for why she scrapped her double layout was because of deductions incurred on the prepatory giants for bent knees, etc. A full in would have the same problem.
Caroline2146 on Tuesday, July 08, 2008
for nastia, it is better for her to do a fowards dismount to avoid dedcutions for giants. she has struggled with the dismount because of endurance problems but when she can do it very well

shawn will not ever compete a def. her gienger is too piked for her to twist it. nastia's is very high and laid out so she could do it, but I'd rather her not because it is very very hard to keep your legs together on that element

Post your comment comment